Concerning the case cited as 2022 YLR 1536, the theory is that the bar of Purchase XXIII, Rule 1, CPC, relates to a fit instituted once the withdrawal/abandonment of the previous fit. Even so, this bar would not implement wherever a new match is currently pending ahead of the withdrawal https://hireciviladvocatenearmeka06044.sharebyblog.com/31453269/considerations-to-know-about-permanent-injection-lawyer-in-karachi